Political Contracts and Dual Democracy

We investigate whether the combination of incentive contracts for politicians and elections (dual democracy) can help to improve democratic election processes. We examine two types of incentives for politicians: Incentive contracts which make the remuneration of a politician dependent on his political performance and threshold incentive contracts which determine a minimum performance level that a politician has to reach in order to be allowed to run for reelection. In particular, we are concerned with the following issues:

  • Can incentive contracts and elections motivate politicians to invest in policies that yield long-term benefits?
  • Can incentive contracts help to improve the politicians' effort-allocation across tasks?
  • Does the competition of politicians for incentive contracts and elections alleviate inefficient decision-making in politics?
  • How can incentive contracts be designed for coalition governments?
  • Can a combination of incentive contracts, elections and political information markets be used to generate incentives to invest in long-term policies whose outcomes are not verifiable?

We examine whether the introduction of a dual mechanism of incentive contracts for politicians and democratic elections improve the quality of democratic decision-making.

Publications

Columns / Policy Briefs

Working Papers

Team Members

Cooperation Partners

JavaScript has been disabled in your browser